Which photography is true, which is a lie?
Poetry or truth ?
Documantary photography or 'malicious' manipulation ?
Falsifying picture detail or fake context ?
These three photos show always the same building, but in different surroundings. Are they digitally manipulated by photoshop?
The building was photographed normally and the photos weren't manipulated anyway. The impression of different surroundings is caused only by different camera position.
These three photos are a quite good example for lack of 'veracity' of the former chemical photography as well.
Photos by Rainer Knäpper 2009 (with his friendly authorizon)
ALL IMAGES AND SITE CONTENT © WOLFGANG HOCK